Table of Contents
Team Vision for Problem Definition PhaseThe team plan to execute during this phase is to thoroughly understand the reason to make a motorized pediatric stander. We placed a heavy concern to understand the positives and pitfalls from previous iterations of this device. We also planned on meeting with the client, Professor Day and CP Rochester to perform a reconnaissance for details regarding room for improvement, enhanced procedures and constraints.
Along with that information, we planned on performing a domain analysis to find set benchmarks set by similar products. We also planned to create documentation to define customer and engineering requirements and identify possible risks as we progress further into the project. The team accomplished all of the planned tasks listed above. Research, client interaction and team forming were the key focuses for this phase of the project.
Project SummaryMotorized pediatric standers are devices that allow for upright maneuverability opportunities for children with certain mobility impairments. This type of stander provides support for children who may have difficulty standing on their own, in addition to bone-growth strength and physical therapy support. The device, further, allows for children to move at some degree of independence, while being remotely-controlled by a supervisor.
Ultimately, motorized pediatric standers permit freedom of mobility, in comparison to standard wheelchairs, for the child to naturally interact with fellow peers and their surrounding environment. Previous iterations of this project have attempted to design a device that meets the specified design requirements to provide a Do-It-Yourself kit, but lacked in key aspects, such as, design variability among standers and kids, ease of use for end-users, and straight line of travel. It is also key to provide better documentation of device assembly, and use-instructions for all stakeholders involved with the final product.
The main goal of this project is to develop a functional motorized stander to be operated with a specific child, while allowing various adjustments for other children and standers to be utilized. In addition, shortfalls of the previous iterations, for instance, cumbersome and variable device design, and end-user Do-It-Yourself kit cost, will be addressed. Overall, the team will improve on the existing technical issues that remain from previous stander prototypes, and work towards improving the stander to be "market-ready". The final design will include the input of both industrial design and business students to ensure appropriate design support and market engagement for the developed product.
Please refer to the Project Summary live document for the most current version.
|Dr. Steven Day||Professor, Client|
|Linda Brown, PT||Client, MSD Sponsor|
|MSD Team P16045||Device Developers|
Customer Interview NotesJanuary 28, 2016: Interview with Dr. Day at R.I.T.
February 4, 2016: Interview with Linda Brown at CP Rochester
We met with Dr. Day and Linda Brown to discuss about their visions for the project and questions we had for them. Dr. Day was able to enlighten us about previous projects and their strengths and weaknesses. Linda Brown gave the team a tour of the CP Rochester facility and the past two standers that were developed by previous senior design teams. Please refer to Interview Questions & Answers for the complete compilation of the questions and answers that were asked in the interviews.
Project Goals and Key DeliverablesThe end deliverable for this project will be to provide a "market-ready" motorized pediatric stander, which can be fitted to accommodate various young children and commercialized stander frames. In addition, the product can be utilized as a supplement to physical therapy sessions to engage the user in a more interactive way and add a certain level of independence for the user. To accomplish this, the following will be considered:
Pediatric Stander Requirements
- Stander will be designed using a commercially available off-the-shelf manual pediatric stander frame.
- Stander will be fitted with no more than 20 lbs. of modification equipment.
- Stander will be operable by a young individual with restricted mobility.
- Stander will have overrides, such as a bumper system and remote controller.
- Stander will gain inputs from the Industrial Design and Business teams.
Design Directives (ID)
- Empower children to have more and better social interactions with their peers.
- Promote a sense of agency and environmental mastery.
- Improve usability of motorized pediatric standers both for the children using it and for parents and therapists interacting with them.
- Improve the experience of installing and maintaining the kit.
- Explore peripherals and modular additions as necessary.
Safety for this stander will be considered in all aspects of this design project.
Customer Requirements (Needs)
Please refer to the Customer Requirements live document for the most current version.
Engineering Requirements (Metrics & Specifications)
Please refer to the Engineering Requirements live document for the most current version.
- Modification Kit Cost - $500 (maximum)
- Material Cost - $250 (not including cost of stander)
- Stander with Modifications Weight - 20 lbs. (maximum)
- Market-Ready Deadline - End of MSD II
House of Quality
Please refer to the House of Quality live document for the most current version.
Please refer to the Risk Management live document for the most current version.
- P13045: Mobile Pediatric Stander
- P14045: Pediatric Stander II
- P15045: Motorized Pediatric Stander - Phase 3
Plans for next phase
The team will use the next three weeks to formulate the system designs necessary for the stander. Dissecting the stander down to its parts will allow for the team to best organize and divide its resources in order to ensure that appropriate support is divvied between tasks (week 4).
With the support of the ID team and appropriate research, the team will finalize on their best solutions from their alternatives, and begin final drafts and feasibility analysis of the chosen design (week 5).
Finally, the team will look to present their chosen concept for review (week 6) and approval in order to move into further subsystem design and analysis.
A copy of the high level project plan can be accessed here (MS Project)