Customer Handoff & Final Project Documentation
Table of Contents
Your website should document your journey through MSD, so include work-in-progress as well as latest results. Use pdf's for display whenever possible so that information is easily viewable without the need to download files and open applications. (Your EDGE file repository should still contain original editable files).
Team Vision for Final Demo and Handoffhere here
Test Results SummaryPrimary and secondary testing was performed to determine the duration of test time. The following parameters were also considered; average voltages, total run time and cool down time between trials. Comparison study was executed with an electric centrifuge to validate the results from the primary and secondary testing.
This output shows us that we can say with a 95% confidence that our statistical model is significant. This means that at least one of our factors is statistically significant and is able to explain or predict the response which is the duration time of our hematocrit test. The model was used to predict the fitted duration time given our ideal values for each of the input variables. With this model we constructed the following prediction interval,
This shows that if the centrifuge is operating with 12 TestTubes, an AvgVolt of 12, with a CoolDown time of 10 minutes, a TotalRunTime of 50 minutes; in order to get an AvgPCV of 47% we will need to run the centrifuge for 40 minutes. Specifically speaking of the time, this means that ideally the centrifuge can be warmed up for 10 minutes and then ran for 40 minutes. We recommend running it for 41 minutes to account for the time required for the centrifuge to ramp up and ramp down during testing.
This output shows us that we can say with a 95% confidence that our statistical model is significant. This means that at least one of our factors is statistically significant and is able to explain or predict the response which is the average packed cell volume. With this model we constructed the following prediction interval,
This prediction interval is just an additional validation to show that our first model that was used to predict the duration time is correct. So with 12 TestTubes, 12 AvgVolt, 10 minutes CoolDown, 50 minutes TotalRunTime and 40 minutes Duration we will get a PCV of 47.3%. This is just a 0.3% difference from the AvgPCV value used for the duration time prediction.
This chart shows that there is in indirect relationship between the packed cell volume and the duration time. As the duration time increases the predicted packed cell volume decreases in a linear fashion. You can also see that as the total run time goes to zero the duration time begins to exceed 40 minutes.
The figure seen above shows some of the results from out vibration tests. As can be seen in the figure, all five tests proved to be relatively consistent, with the small increase in magnitude attributed to the motors getting up to operation temperature. Though this test wasn't incredibly useful for us running 12 volts through the motor, it may have been a more critical test if we had decided to stay with 24 volts.
Battery Life Testing
Before the ideal test length was determined, we conducted battery life tests. Using both a 1 and 2 battery setup, we ran the centrifuge repeatedly for 15 minute increments. This was meant to simulate the conditions of running several back to back tests. We found that the 1 battery set up tapers off after about 2.5 hours, while the 2 battery setup shows no real change. It's worth noting that the drop at the end of the 1 battery test was caused by the motor cooling down too much between test cycles.
Final System Architecture Concept
- Link to Risk Management.
Final Project Documentation
- Include a link to your team's technical paper here.
Imagine RIT Poster
- Include a link to your team's final poster here.